International Journal of Reliability, Risk and Safety: Theory and Application

International Journal of Reliability, Risk and Safety: Theory and Application

Case Studies in Seismic Risk Assessment of Masonry Fire Station Buildings

Document Type : Industrial Case Study

Authors
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Behbahan Khatam Alanbia University of Technology, Behbahan, Iran
2 Center of Monitoring Assessment and Prediction of Natural Disasters (MAP), Behbahan Khatam Alanbia University of Technology, Behbahan, Iran
3 Faculty of Natural Resources, Behbahan Khatam Alanbia University of Technology, Behbahan, Iran
Abstract
Risk analysis serves as a fundamental component for decision-making in pre-event planning aimed at crisis prevention and emergency management. This paper presents a comprehensive risk analysis for two fire station unreinforced masonry buildings as case studies. We conduct both deterministic (DSHA) and non-extensive probabilistic seismic hazard analyses (NEPSHA). The deterministic analysis indicates peak ground accelerations (PGA) of 0.6g and 0.33 at the building sites. The NEPSHA reveals PGA values corresponding to return periods of 10, 475, and 2475 years as 0.033g, 0.43g, and 0.745g, for site 1 and as 0.033g, 0.425g, and 0.761g, for site 2 respectively. Additionally, we establish fragility curves for the existing masonry buildings with median and low code grades. The analysis determines the probabilities of various damage levels at different hazard intensities, and utilizing FEMA's Hazus methodology, we estimate the debris generated. These results indicate that the unreinforced masonry building, despite being equipped with horizontal and vertical tie beams, fails to meet the seismic design requirements. Given the critical role of the fire department building in emergency response during and after an earthquake, further investigation into the building's performance under severe and deterministic (scenario) earthquakes is essential.
Keywords
Subjects

  1. K. Mazumder, S. Rana, and A. M. Salman, "First level seismic risk assessment of old unreinforced masonry (URM) using fuzzy synthetic evaluation," Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 44, 2021, Art. no. 103162, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103162.
  2. Bernardo, R. Sousa, P. Candeias, A. Costa, and A. Campos Costa, "Historic appraisal review and geometric characterization of old masonry buildings in Lisbon for seismic risk assessment," International Journal of Architectural Heritage, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1921–1941, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2021.1918287.
  3. ISNA, “10 million buildings in Iran do not have skeletons: concern about the large number of unsustainable buildings,” (2020, Jul. 24). [Online]. Available: https://www.isna.ir/news/99050301620.
  4. "Design and Construction of Masonry buildings, (part 8)," Ministry of Housing and Urban Development, Tehran, Iran, 2019 (in Persian).
  5. Motaghed, A. Nakhlian, L. Emadali, N. Eftekhari, and H. Mahmoudian, "Seismic hazard assessment using arithmetic-weighted overlay method based on earthquake potential index (EPI), the southwestern Iran," Iranian Journal of Remote Sensing & GIS, 2023, (in Persian), doi: https://doi.org/10.48308/gisj.2023.229646.1133.
  6. Abbasi Kia, M. Nadjafi, and A. Nadjafi, "Safety assessment of people in public building fire incidents using harmony search algorithm," International Journal of Reliability, Risk and Safety: Theory and Application, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 33–40, 2022, https://doi.org/10.30699/IJRRS.5.2.4.
  7. H. Moghimi Esfandabadi, A. Esmaeili, and K. Karbasishargh, "Optimizing performance through retrofitting: strategies for effectiveness, defence, and resiliency to enhance safety and reliability," International Journal of Reliability, Risk and Safety: Theory and Application, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 83–92, 2024, doi: 10.22034/IJRRS.2024.7.1.10.
  8. Araghizadeh, M. Saghafi Nia, and V. Entezari, “Analyzing medical management in disasters: A Review of the Bam Earthquake experience,” Journal of Military Medicine, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 259-268., 2004. (in Persian)
  9. Nekoei-Moghadam, M. Amiresmaili, and Z. Aradoei, “Investigation of obstacles against effective crisis management in earthquake,” Journal of Acute Disease, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 91-95, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joad.2015.10.001.
  10. Ziari, R. Ziari, and S. Ziari, “A case study of the Bam earthquake to establish a pattern for earthquake management in Iran.,” Space Ontology International Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, 2015, pp. 63-70, 2015.
  11. Mehrabi Moghadam, A. Yazdani, and S. Motaghed, "Considering the yielding displacement uncertainty in reliability of mid-rise RC structures," Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 141–157, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.22075/jrce.2021.19660.1376.
  12. Farideh Moradi Tayebi, Sasan Motaghed, and Rezvan Dastanian, “Nature evaluation and time series prediction of Tehran earthquakes,” Modares Civil Engineering Journal, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 147–160, 2020. (in Persian)
  13. Motaghed, A. Mehrabi Moghaddam, and N. Moayyeri, "Reliability of Iranian existing residential reinforced concrete structures in seismic events," International Journal of Reliability, Risk and Safety: Theory and Application, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 55–64, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.22034/ijrrs.2023.6.2.7
  14. Motaghed and A. R. Fakhriyat, "Modeling inelastic behavior of RC adhered shear walls in OpenSees," Journal of Modeling in Engineering, vol. 18, no. 63, pp. 15–25, 2021, (in Persian), doi: https://doi.org/10.22075/jme.2020.18042.1740.
  15. Barzian, S. Motaghed, A. Mehrabi Moghaddam, S. A. Asghari Pari, and L. Emadali, "Investigation the effect of structural parameters uncertainty on the response of incremental dynamic analysis of intermediate steel moment resisting frame structures," Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 175–195, 2022, (in Persian), doi: https://doi.org/10.22065/jsce.2022.311616.2612.
  16. Mehrabi-Moghaddam, S. Motaghed, A. Yazdani, and A. Mehrabi-Moghaddam, "Seismic assessment of collapse prevention limit-state of RC structures using numerical integration method," in 11th National Congress on Civil Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran, 2019.
  17. Motaghed and A. Khooshecharkh, "Probabilistic evaluation of the effects of concrete compression strength on the reinforced concrete building damageability," European Journal of Scientific Research, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 202–207, 2011.
  18. Motaghed, M. S. Shahid Zadeh, A. Khooshecharkh, and M. Askari, "Implementation of AI for the prediction of failures of reinforced concrete frames," International Journal of Reliability, Risk and Safety: Theory and Application, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–7, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.30699/IJRRS.5.2.1.
  19. Yaghmaei, S. Motaghed, A. Khooshecharrkh, "Correlation study between ground motion characteristic and RC frames damageability with intermediate ductility in Iran," Asas Journal, vol. 13, no. 28, pp. 60-70, 2018. (in Persian)
  20. F. Restrepo-Velez, and G.Magenes, "Simplified procedure for the seismic risk assessment of unreinforced masonry buildings, "In 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, Canada, 2004, Art. no. 2561.
  21. Snoj and M. Dolšek, "Pushover‐based seismic risk assessment and loss estimation of masonry buildings," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 567–588, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3254.
  22. Nicknam, M. Khanzadi, S. Motaghed, and A. Yazdani, "Applying b-value variation to seismic hazard analysis using closed-form joint probability distribution," Journal of Vibroengineering, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1376-1386, 2014.
  23. Khanzadi, A. Nicknam, A. Yazdani, and S. Motaghed, "A Bayesian approach for seismic recurrence parameters estimation," Journal of Vibroengineering, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 977-986, 2014.
  24. Croce, F. Landi, and P. Formichi, "Probabilistic seismic assessment of existing masonry buildings," Buildings, vol. 9, no. 12, p. 237, 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings9120237.
  25. Erdik, "Earthquake risk assessment," Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 5055–5092, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0235-2.
  26. W. Jia and Z. Y. Wu, "Seismic risk analysis based on imprecise distribution and failure probability function under multidimensional limit state," Structures, vol. 50, pp. 963–977, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.02.036.
  27. C. Ponzo et al., "Advanced modelling and risk analysis of RC buildings with sliding isolation systems designed by the Italian seismic code," Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 1938, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041938.
  28. Ezzeldin, L. Wiebe, and W. El-Dakhakhni, "System-level seismic risk assessment methodology: Application to reinforced masonry buildings with boundary elements," Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 143, no. 9, pp. 04017084, 2017.doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001815
  29. D’Amato, R. Laguardia, G. Di Trocchio, M. Coltellacci, and R. Gigliotti, "Seismic risk assessment for masonry buildings typologies from L’Aquila 2009 earthquake damage data," Journal of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 4545-4579, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2020.1835750.
  30. Nastev, "Adapting Hazus for seismic risk assessment in Canada," Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 217–222, 2014. doi: https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2013-0080.
  31. Mangalathu, "Performance based grouping and fragility analysis of box-girder bridges in California," Ph.D. dissertation, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA, 2017.
  32. Badawy, I. Korrat, M. El-Hadidy, and H. Gaber, "Probabilistic earthquake hazard analysis for Cairo, Egypt," Journal of Seismology, vol. 20, pp. 449-461, 2016.
  33. Motaghed, M. Mohammadi, N. Eftekhari, and M. khazaee, "SCP parameters estimation for catalogs with uncertain seismic magnitude values," Acta Geophysica, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-024-01404-5.
  34. Yazdani, A. Nicknam, M. Khanzadi, and S. Motaghed, "An Artificial statistical method to estimate seismicity parameter from incomplete earthquake catalogs, a case study in metropolitan Tehran, Iran," Scientia Iranica, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 400-409, 2015.
  35. Motaghed, M. Khazaee, and M. Mohammadi, "The b-value estimation based on the artificial statistical method for Iran Kope-Dagh seismic province," Arabian Journal of Geosciences, vol. 14, no. 15, 2021, Art. no. 1461, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-07970-y.
  36. Motaghed, M. Khazaee, N. Eftekhari, and M. Mohammadi, "A non-extensive approach to probabilistic seismic hazard analysis," Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1117–1124, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1117-2023.
  37. K. S. Thingbaijam et al., "Characteristic versus Gutenberg–Richter nucleation‐based magnitude–frequency distributions in the New Zealand National Seismic Hazard Model 2022," Seismological Research Letters, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 226-238, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220230220.
  38. “Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings,” Applied Technology Council, California, USA, Rep. SSC 96-01: ATC-40, 1, 1996.
  39. “Earthquake model, Hazus–MH 2.1 technical manual,” Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, USA, 2012.
  40. Karim Zadeh, M. Ghafory-Ashtiany, A. Kalantari, and S. Shokuhirad, "Development of analytical seismic fragility functions for the common buildings in Iran," Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 5905–5942, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01411-1.
  41. “Instruction for Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings,” Vice Presidency for Strategic Planning and Supervision, 92/131010, Tehran, Iran, 2014. (in Persian)
  42. Ghasemi, M. Zare, Y. Fukushima, and K. Koketsu, "An empirical spectral ground-motion model for Iran," Journal of Seismology, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 499–515, 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-008-9143-x.
  43. Motaghed and A. Fakhriyat, "A reliable method for determining the tapered minimum magnitude in a probabilistic seismic hazard analysis," International Journal of Reliability, Risk and Safety: Theory and Application, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 89–95, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.30699/ijrrs.5.2.9.
  44. Akkar and Z. Cagnan, "A Local Ground-Motion Predictive Model for Turkey, and Its Comparison with Other Regional and Global Ground-Motion Models," Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 100, no. 6, pp. 2978–2995, 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120090367.
  45. Akkar, M. A. Sandıkkaya, and J. J. Bommer, "Empirical ground-motion models for point- and extended-source crustal earthquake scenarios in Europe and the Middle East," Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 359–387, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9461-4.
  46. J. Chiou and R. R. Youngs, "An NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra," Earthquake Spectra, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 173–215, 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2894832.
  47. X. Zhao, "Attenuation Relations of strong ground motion in Japan using site classification based on predominant period," Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 898–913, 2006, doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120050122.
  48. Fanni and A. Roshan, "Location of fire stations with passive defense approach Case study: Behbahan City," Scientific- Research Quarterly of Geographical Data (SEPEHR), vol. 26, no. 101, pp. 81-92, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.22131/sepehr.2017.25728.
  49. G. Rahmat et al., "Landfill site selection using GIS and AHP: a case study: Behbahan, Iran," KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 111-118, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0296-9.
  50. Ghouchani, M. Taji, and M. Darbaniyan, "Evaluation of the effective factors on increasing the risk of damages to urban buildings in post-earthquake fire crisis by AHP method," (in eng), Disaster Prevention and Management Knowledge, Research vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 293-306, 2019, (in Persian).
Volume 7, Issue 2
October 2024
Pages 40-51

  • Receive Date 05 August 2024
  • Revise Date 18 September 2024
  • Accept Date 02 October 2024