International Journal of Reliability, Risk and Safety: Theory and Application

International Journal of Reliability, Risk and Safety: Theory and Application

Developing a New Fuzzy Clustering Method for Equipment Maintenance

Document Type : Original Research Article

Authors
1 Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
2 Electronics Research Institute, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
3 Zarand Iranian Steel Company (ZISCO), Kerman, Iran
Abstract
Data can enhance equipment maintenance and asset management by providing predictive insights and minimizing downtime. Implementing data gathering and predictive maintenance systems is essential for improving reliability and cost efficiency. However, addressing challenges such as high implementation costs, data integration issues, and the need for skilled personnel is crucial for maximizing their benefits. Maintenance managers at a steel holding company in Iran, as a case study aimed to implement predictive maintenance but faced high costs for full implementation. Selecting a subset of equipment parts posed a complex decision-making problem, as eligibility needed to be based on maintenance criteria rather than traditional factors like price and location. To address this, we proposed a framework using machine learning to cluster equipment parts based on maintenance-related criteria. While clustering simplifies decision-making, it introduces uncertainty. To mitigate this, we represent each cluster with a trapezoidal fuzzy number. The Silhouette method is employed to determine the optimal number of clusters, followed by the K-means++ method for clustering. Our approach successfully grouped 201 equipment parts into seven clusters based on criteria such as importance, maintenance period, and daily working hours. Fuzzy logic is used to interpret the clusters, reducing uncertainty and ensuring that no equipment is overlooked.
Keywords
Subjects

  1. P. Carvalho, F. A. A. M. N. Soares, R. Vita, R. da P. Francisco, J. P. Basto, and S. G. S. Alcalá, “A systematic literature review of machine learning methods applied to predictive maintenance,” Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 137, 2019, Art. no. 106024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.cie. 2019.106024.
  2. Bevilacqua and M. Braglia, “The analytic hierarchy process applied to maintenance strategy selection,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 71-83, 2000, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(00)00047-8.
  3. K. Mobley, An Introduction to Predictive Maintenance, 2nd Ed. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2002. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-7531-4.X5000-3.
  4. -H. Ding and S. Kamaruddin, “Maintenance policy optimization—literature review and directions,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 76, pp. 1263-1283, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6341-2.
  5. K. Mobley, An Introduction to Predictive Maintenance, USA: Elsevier, 2002.
  6. J. Turner, C. Emmanouilidis, T. Tomiyama, A. Tiwari, and R. Roy, “Intelligent decision support for maintenance: An overview and future trends,” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 936-959, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2019.1667033.
  7. Azadeh, M. Sheikhalishahi, and F. Monshi, “Selecting optimum maintenance activity plans by a unique simulation-multivariate approach,” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 1-15, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2014.1003409.
  8. De Jonge, W. Klingenberg, R. Teunter, and T. Tinga, “Reducing costs by clustering maintenance activities for multiple critical units,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 145, pp. 93-103, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.09.003.
  9. Bazeli and M. S. Fallahnezhad, “Clustering of condition-based maintenance considering perfect and imperfect actions,” International Journal of Reliability, Risk and Safety: Theory and Application, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 69-76, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.30699/IJRRS.3.1.8.
  10. Passlick, S. Dreyer, D. Olivotti, L. Grützner, D. Eilers, and M. H. Breitner, “Predictive maintenance as an internet of things enabled business model: A taxonomy,” Electronic Markets, vol. 31, pp. 67–87, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-020-00440-5.
  11. Yang, P. Baraldi, and E. Zio, “A novel method for maintenance record clustering and its application to a case study of maintenance optimization,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 203, 2020, Art. no. 107103, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107103.
  12. Cao, A. Samet, C. Zanni-Merk, F. D. B. De Beuvron, and C. Reich, “An Ontology-based Approach for Failure Classification in Predictive Maintenance Using Fuzzy C-means and SWRL Rules,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 159, pp. 630–639, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.218.
  13. Amruthnath and T. Gupta, “A research study on unsupervised machine learning algorithms for early fault detection in predictive maintenance,” in 5th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications, 2018, pp. 355–361, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/IEA.2018.8387124.
  14. Thor, S.H. Ding, and S. Kamaruddin, “Comparison of multi criteria decision making methods from the maintenance alternative selection perspective,” International Journal of Engineering and Science, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 27-34, 2013.
  15. Janssen, H. van der Voort, and A. Wahyudi, “Factors influencing big data decision-making quality,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 70, pp. 338–345, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.007.
  16. Beig Zali, M. Latifi, A. A. Javadi, and R. Farmani, “Semisupervised clustering approach for pipe failure prediction with imbalanced data set,” Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, vol. 150, no. 2, 2024, Art. no. 04023078, doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6263.
  17. Oliosi, G. Calzavara, and G. Ferrari, “On sensor data clustering for machine status monitoring and its application to predictive maintenance,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 9620–9639, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/jsen.2023.3260314.
  18. C. Rodriguez, P. Marti-Puig, C. F. Caiafa, M. Serra-Serra, J. Cusidó, and J. Solé-Casals, “Exploratory analysis of scada data from wind turbines using the k-means clustering algorithm for predictive maintenance purposes,” Machines 2023, Vol. 11, Page 270, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 270, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/machines11020270.
  19. Predictive Maintenance et al., “Predictive maintenance system for wafer transport robot using k-means algorithm and neural network model,” Electronics, Vol. 11, Page 1324, vol. 11, no. 9, 2022, Art. no. 1324, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11091324.
  20. [20] W. Barker, N. Bhowmik, and Toby. P. Breckon, “Semi-Supervised Surface Anomaly Detection of Composite Wind Turbine Blades From Drone Imagery,” in 17th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications, Volume 4: VISAPP, 2022, pp. 868-876, doi: https://doi.org/10.5220/0010842100003124.
  21. Duan, C. Gui, and Y. Hou, “Monitoring-based maintenance decision-making models for subgrade settlement,” in Green and Intelligent Technologies for Sustainable and Smart Asphalt Pavements, X. Liu et al. Ed. London: CRC Press, 2021, pp. 655-661.
  22. V. Kamat, R. Sugandhi, and S. Kumar, “Deep learning-based anomaly-onset aware remaining useful life estimation of bearings,” PeerJ Computer Science, vol. 7, p. e795, 2021, Art. no. e795, doi: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.795.
  23. Wu et al., “K-PdM: KPI-Oriented Machinery Deterioration Estimation Framework for Predictive Maintenance Using Cluster-Based Hidden Markov Model,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 41676-41687, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2859922.
  24. Uhlmann, R. P. Pontes, C. Geisert, and E. Hohwieler, “Cluster identification of sensor data for predictive maintenance in a Selective Laser Melting machine tool,” Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 24, pp. 60-65, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.06.009.
  25. K. Durbhaka and B. Selvaraj, “Predictive maintenance for wind turbine diagnostics using vibration signal analysis based on collaborative recommendation approach,” in International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics, 2016, pp. 1839-1842. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCI.2016.7732316.
  26. Langone, C. Alzate, B. De Ketelaere, J. Vlasselaer, W. Meert, and J. A. K. Suykens, “LS-SVM based spectral clustering and regression for predicting maintenance of industrial machines,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 37, pp. 268-278, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2014.09.008.
  27. Van Dijkhuizen and A. Van Harten, “Optimal clustering of frequency-constrained maintenance jobs with shared set-ups,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 552-564, 1997, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00320-7.
  28. Arena, E. Florian, F. Sgarbossa, E. Sølvsberg, and I. Zennaro, “A conceptual framework for machine learning algorithm selection for predictive maintenance,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 133, part D, , 2024, Art. no. 108340, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108340.
  29. Azadeh, M. Sheikhalishahi, S. M. Khalili, and M. Firoozi, “An integrated fuzzy simulation–fuzzy data envelopment analysis approach for optimum maintenance planning,”, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 181–199, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2013.812804.
  30. García, J. Luengo, and F. Herrera, Data Preprocessing in Data Mining. Cham: Springer, 2015.
  31. Ghiassi, H. Saidane, and R. Oswal, “YAC2: An α-proximity based clustering algorithm,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 167, 2021, Art. no. 114138, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114138.
  32. Asroni and R. Adrian, “Penerapan Metode K-Means Untuk Clustering Mahasiswa Berdasarkan Nilai Akademik Dengan Weka Interface Studi Kasus Pada Jurusan Teknik Informatika UMM Magelang,” Semesta Teknika, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 76–82, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.18196/st.v18i1.708.
  33. Setyaningtyas, B. I. Nugroho, and Z. Arif, “Tinjauan pustaka sistematis pada data mining: studi kasus algoritma k-means clustering,” Jurnal Teknoif Teknik Informatika Institut Teknologi Padang, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 52-61, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.21063/jtif.2022.V10.2.52-61.
  34. Vassilvitskii, “K-means: algorithms, analyses, experiments,” Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, Department, University, California, USA, 2007., 2007.
  35. Kapoor and A. Singhal, “A comparative study of K-Means, K-Means++ and Fuzzy C-Means clustering algorithms,” in 3rd International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Technology (CICT), 2017, pp. 1-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/CIACT.2017.7977272.
  36. Weißer, T. Saßmannshausen, D. Ohrndorf, P. Burggräf, and J. Wagner, “A clustering approach for topic filtering within systematic literature reviews,” MethodsX, vol. 7, 2020, Art. no. 100831, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2020.100831.
  37. J. Rousseeuw, “Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 20, pp. 53-65, 1987, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7.
  38. Dubois and H. Prade, “Operations on fuzzy numbers,” International Journal of Systems Science, Vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 613-626, 1978, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207727808941724.
  39. F. Niu, R.H. Zhou, X.Z. Xu, and H.Y. Xiang, “A reliability index to measure multi-state flow network considering capacity restoration level and maintenance cost,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 250, 2024, Art. no. 110209, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110209.
  40. Peng, M. Dong, and M. J. Zuo, “Current status of machine prognostics in condition-based maintenance: a review,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 50, pp. 297-313, 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2482-0.
  41. -S. Shum and D.-C. Gong, “The application of genetic algorithm in the development of preventive maintenance analytic model,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 32, pp. 169-183, 2007, doi:
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-0314-4.
  42. Abbasbandy and T. Hajjari, “A new approach for ranking of trapezoidal fuzzy numbers,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 413-419, Feb. 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2008.10.090.
Volume 7, Issue 2
October 2024
Pages 62-70

  • Receive Date 15 September 2024
  • Revise Date 16 November 2024
  • Accept Date 16 November 2024