International Journal of Reliability, Risk and Safety: Theory and Application

International Journal of Reliability, Risk and Safety: Theory and Application

Identification and Analysis of Human Error for an Explosives Production Facility: Application and Comparison of TESEO, HEART and AHP Integrated HEART Methods

Document Type : Industrial Case Study

Authors
1 Republic of Turkey Ministry of Industry and Technology, Ankara, Turkey
2 Faculty of Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
3 Republic of Turkey Ministry of Labour and Social Security, Ankara, Turkey
Abstract
This study identified possible risk factors that may cause accidents by the Hazard and Operability Analysis (HAZOP) in an explosion production facility to enhance safety and operational reliability in the explosive industry. Then, human-induced errors were determined among these risk factors. These human errors were quantified using the Tecnica Empirica Stima Errori Operatori (TESEO), the Human Error Evaluation and Reduction Technique (HEART), and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) integrated HEART methods. The approaches were interpreted by comparing them with each other. As a result, the probability of human error was more significant for the HEART method in the vast majority. This is because, compared to the TESEO approach, which allows for rapid analysis, the HEART method considers various environmental and task-related working conditions that may cause human error. It was concluded that integrating the AHP technique into the HEART method contributed to the purification of the subjectivity of the HEART method, which includes expert judgments.
Keywords
Subjects

  1. Akman, “Determination of Risk Factors in an Explosive Manufacturing Facility and Analyzing the Impacts Intended for Explosion Risk,” Ph.D. dissertation, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Environmental and Technical Research of Accidents, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey, 2015, (in Turkish).
  2. M. Chiara, “Human errors analysis and safety management systems in hazardous activities,” International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Schlossplatz, Laxenburg, Austria, Rep. IR-05-003, 2005.
  3. H. MoghimiEsfandabadi, M. H. Djavareshkian, and S. Abedi, “Significance of aviation safety, its evaluation, and ways to strengthen security,” International Journal of Reliability, Risk and Safety: Theory and Application, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 37-45, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.22034/IJRRS.2023.6.2.5.
  4. M. Cheng and S.L. Hwang, “Applications of integrated human error identification techniques on the chemical cylinder change task,” Applied Ergonomics, vol. 47, pp. 274-284, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2014.10.008.
  5. P. Bowo, M. Furusho, and W. Mutmainnah, “A new HEART – 4m method for human error assessment in maritime collision accidents,” Transactions of Navigation, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 39-46, 2020.
  6. C. Bello and V. Colombari, “The human factors in risk analyses of process plants: The control room operator model 'TESEO',” Reliability Engineering, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3-14, 1980, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-8174(80)90010-4.
  7. Shahriari, J. Starhe, and E. Hektor, "Evaluation and improvement of man-machine interaction in tank lorry loading-A case study," IFAC Proceedings Volumes, vol. 40, no. 16, pp. 366-371, 2007, doi: https://doi.org/10.3182/20070904-3-KR-2922.00064.
  8. Cameron, S. Mannan, E. Nemeth, S. Park, H. Pasman, W. Rogers, and B. Seligmann, “Process Hazard Analysis, Hazard Identification and Scenario Definition: Are the Conventional Tools Sufficient, or Should and Can We Do Much Better?,” Process Safety and Environmental Protection, vol. 110, pp. 53-70, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.01.025.
  9. I. Iqbal, O. Isaac, I.A. Rajawy, S. Khuthbuddin, and A. Ameen, “Hazard identification and risk assessment with controls (Hirac) in oil industry – A proposed approach,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 44, part 6, pp. 4898-4902, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.800.
  10. M. Salemi and L. Ebrahimy Ghavam Abadi, “Review and comparison of different risk assessment methods used for intelligent pigging operations in oil and gas pipelines with emphasis on the Bow Tie method,” International Journal of Reliability, Risk and Safety: Theory and Application, vol. 7, vol. 1, pp. 1-8, doi: https://doi.org/10.22034/IJRRS.2024.7.1.1.
  11. Prasad and A.J. Gaikwad, “Human error probability estimation by coupling simulator data and deterministic analysis,” Progress in Nuclear Energy, vol. 81, pp. 22-29, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2015.01.008.
  12. Castiglia and M. Giardina, “Analysis of operator human errors in hydrogen refuelling stations: comparison between human rate assessment techniques,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 1166-1176, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.10.092.
  13. Wang, X. Liu, and Y. Qin, “A modified HEART method with FANP for human error assessment in high-speed railway dispatching tasks,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 67, pp. 242-258, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2018.06.002.
  14. L. Zhou, Y. Lei, and Y. Chen, “A hybrid HEART method to estimate human error probabilities in locomotive driving process,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 188, pp. 80-89, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.03.001.
  15. Hoscan and S. Çetinyokuş, “Determination of Emergency assembly point for industrial accidents with AHP analysis,” Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 69, pp. 104386, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104386.
  16. Akyüz and M. Çelik, “A methodological to human reliability analysis for cargo tank cleaning operation on board chemical tanker ships,” Safety Science, vol. 75, pp. 146-155, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ssci.2015.02.008.
  17. Macdonald and S. Mackay, “Practical hazop, trips and alarms,” Elsevier, 2004, pp. 98-99.
  18. Shafieenejad, M. Nourianpour, M.B. Dehkordi, and K. Ansari, “A comprehensive review of safety and risk management strategies in aerospace operations for human casualty mitigation,” International Journal of Reliability, Risk and Safety: Theory and Application, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 111-130, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.22034/IJRRS.2023.6.1.12.
  19. Wu and M. Lind, “Management of system complexity in HAZOP for the oil and gas industry,” IFAC-Papers Online, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 211-216, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.06.379.
  20. Center for Chemical Process Safety, Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures, 3rd ed. New Jersey, USA, Wiley, 2008, pp. 117-118.
  21. Chae, Y. H. Yoon, and E. S. Yoon, "A Knowledge-Based Expert System for Hazard and Operability Studies," in Interactions Between Process Design and Process Control, J. D. Perkins Ed. Oxford: Pergamon, 1992, pp. 215-220, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-042063-9.50032-7.
  22. Crawley and B. Tyler, HAZOP: Guide to Best Practice, 3rd ed. Elsevier, 2015, pp. 16-18.
  23. A. Ericson, Hazard Analysis Techniques for System Safety, Wiley, 2015, pp. 372-373.
  24. Evans, H. Ying, L. Maglaras, and H. Janicke, “HEART-IS: A novel technique for evaluating human error-related information security incidents,” Computer & Security, vol. 80, pp. 74-89, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2018.09.002.
  25. Petrillo, D. Falcone, F.D. Felice, and F. Zomparelli, “Development of a risk analysis model to evaluate human error in industrial plants and in critical infrastructures,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 23, pp. 15-24, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.03.012.
  26. Bell and J. Holroyd, Review of Human Reliability Assessment Methods, Derbyshire, England, Health and Safety Executive, 2009, pp. 14-18.
  27. C. Williams, “Heart–A Proposed Method for Achieving High Reliability in Process Operation by Means of Human Factors Engineering Technology,” Safety and Reliability, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 5-25, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09617353.2015.11691046.
  28. İ.F. Gülenç and G.A. Bilgin, “A model proposal for investment decisions: AHP method,” Journal of Öneri, vol. 9, no. 34, pp. 97-107, 2010 (in Turkish).
  29. E. Nebati, G.N. Sağanda, H. Erol, S.R. Subaşı, and T.E. Göz, “Evaluation of employee performance by the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University Journal of Engineering Science, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 582-590, 2021, (in Turkish), doi: https://doi.org/10.28948/ngumuh.790551.
  30. Yorulmaz and A. Aksu, “Assessment of occupational health and safety practice performance in port operations by AHP method: case of Kocaeli Port region,” Sakarya University the Journal of Business Science, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1-24, 2021, (in Turkish), doi: https://doi.org/10.22139/jobs.875400.
  31. Keçek and R. Yüksel, “Smartphone selection with analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and promethee methods,” Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 49, pp. 46-63, 2016.

Volume 7, Issue 2
October 2024
Pages 133-151

  • Receive Date 22 November 2024
  • Revise Date 30 December 2024
  • Accept Date 31 December 2024