International Journal of Reliability, Risk and Safety: Theory and Application

International Journal of Reliability, Risk and Safety: Theory and Application

Fault Lines Due to Ignored Early Warnings: Lessons from the Cheshmeh-Khosh Oil Transmission System

Document Type : Industrial Case Study

Authors
1 Department of Operations Management and Information Technology, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
2 West Oil and Gas Production Company, Iran
Abstract
Globally, oil pipeline failures can lead to catastrophic human casualties, environmental damage, and economic losses, emphasizing the need for robust risk management. This study addresses these challenges through a case analysis of the Cheshmeh-Khosh–Ahvaz oil pipeline in southwestern Iran, integrating multiple methodologies within a dynamic risk assessment framework. The approach combines Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) and Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) to identify and evaluate operational risks systematically, employs fuzzy logic to quantify uncertain linguistic data, and incorporates a Bayesian Network (BN) for real-time probability updating. The model is informed by field observations, expert interviews, and historical data, and Bayesian inference enables continuous updating of failure likelihoods as new information emerges. This multi-method approach quantifies uncertainty and dynamically reprioritizes risk factors, identifying improper pipeline routing as a dominant failure cause in the case study. Notably, while prior studies applied fuzzy FTA to subsea pipeline systems, this work is the first to implement a fuzzy-FTA–FMEA–BN methodology for a terrestrial pipeline, capturing onshore-specific risk factors and enabling real-time risk updates. Practical implications include enhanced pipeline safety through real-time monitoring and targeted maintenance, as well as improving resource allocation to mitigate the highest risks. In sum, the integrated framework offers both a theoretical advancement in probabilistic risk modeling and an operational tool for safer pipeline decision-making.
Keywords
Subjects

  1. S. Pedersen and D. Ahsan, "Emergency preparedness and response: Insights from the emerging offshore wind industry," Safety Science, vol. 121, 516-528, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.09.022.
  2. Bhardwaj, A. P. Teixeira, and C. Guedes Soares, "An advanced methodology for probabilistic risk assessment under limited and uncertain data: Application to offshore accidents," Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 76, 2025, Art. no. 105666, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2025.105666.
  3. Abbasi Kharajou, H. Ahmadi, M. Rafiei, and S. Moradi Hanifi, "Quantitative risk estimation of CNG station by using fuzzy Bayesian networks and consequence modeling," Scientific Reports, vol. 14, 2024, Art. no. 4266, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54842-y.
  4. Cheliyan and S. Bhattacharyya, "Fuzzy fault tree analysis of oil and gas leakage in subsea production systems," Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 38-48, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joes.2017.11.005.
  5. K. Bhattacharyya and A. S. Cheliyan, "Optimization of a subsea production system for cost and reliability using its fault tree model," Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 185, pp. 213-219, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.12.030.
  6. Hong, B. Shao, J. Guo, J. Fu, C. Li, and B. Zhu, "Dynamic bayesian network risk probability evolution for third-party damage of natural gas pipelines," Applied Energy, vol. 333, 2023, Art. no. 120620, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120620.
  7. Kalantarnia, F. Khan, and K. Hawboldt, "Dynamic risk assessment using failure assessment and Bayesian theory," Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 600-606, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2009.04.006.
  8. Partovi, M. Amra, M. Pahlevanzadeh, A. Alwardi, and M. R. Fathi, "Predictable maintenance: A Bayesian network-based model," International Journal of Reliability, Risk and Safety: Theory and Application, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 97-105, 2022, https://doi.org/10.30699/IJRRS.5.2.10.
  9. Khakzad, F. Khan, and P. Amyotte, "Safety analysis in process facilities: Comparison of fault tree and Bayesian network approaches," Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 96, no. 8, pp. 925–932, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2011.03.012.
  10. Qin, Y. Xi, and W. Pedrycz, "Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) for risk assessment based on interval type-2 fuzzy evidential reasoning method," Applied Soft Computing, vol. 89, no. C, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106134.
  11. Yazdi and S. Kabir, "Fuzzy evidence theory and Bayesian networks for process systems risk analysis," Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 57-86, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2018.1493679.
  12. Wang, A. Xia, and G. Qin, "Fuzzy Bayesian network–based multidimensional risk assessment for leakage of blended hydrogen natural gas pipelines," Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, vol. 15, no. 2, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1061/JPSEA2.PSENG-1577.
  13. Wu et al., "A novel dynamic risk assessment method for the petrochemical industry using bowtie analysis and Bayesian network based on the ARAMIS project framework," Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 237, 2023, Art. no. 109397, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109397.
  14. I. Sezer, G. Elidolu, M. Aydin, S. I. Ahn, E. Akyuz, and R. E. Kurt, "Analyzing human reliability for the operation of cargo oil pump using fuzzy CREAM extended Bayesian network (BN)," Ocean Engineering, vol. 299, 2024, Art. no. 117345, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117345.
  15. Pang, Z. Zhang, Z. Zhou, and Q. Li, "Risk diagnosis analysis of ethane storage tank leakage based on fault tree and fuzzy Bayesian network," Applied Sciences, vol. 15, no. 4, 2025, Art. no. 1754, https://doi.org/10.3390/app15041754.
  16. Zarei, N. Khakzad, V. Cozzani, and G. Reniers, "Safety analysis of process systems using fuzzy Bayesian network (FBN)," Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 57, pp. 7-16, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2018.10.011.
  17. Reuters, "Three workers killed in Iran pipeline gas leak blast -state media." (2021, Jul. 06). [Online]. Available: http://reuters.com/world/middle-east/three-workers-killed-iran-pipeline-gas-leak-blast-state-media-2021-07-06/
  18. 2023 Guidelines for States Participating in the Pipeline Safety Program, U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), 2023, [Online]. Available: https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/about-phmsa/working-phmsa/state-programs/2023-guidelines-states-participating-pipeline-safety-program.
  19. Shahriar, R. Sadiq, and S. Tesfamariam, "Risk analysis for oil & gas pipelines: A sustainability assessment approach using fuzzy based bow-tie analysis," Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 505-523, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2011.12.007.
  20. M. Salemi and L. E. G. Abadi, "Review and comparison of different risk assessment methods used for intelligent pigging operations in oil and gas pipelines with emphasis on the bow tie method," International Journal of Reliability, Risk and Safety: Theory and Application, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1-8, 2024, https://doi.org/10.22034/IJRRS.2024.7.1.1.
Volume 8, Issue 1
June 2025
Pages 98-113

  • Receive Date 24 April 2025
  • Revise Date 27 July 2025
  • Accept Date 30 July 2025